git - Phabricator: advantage/disadvantage of hosted repository? -


our company uses phabricator non-hosted svn repository.

we switching single svn repo git repo-per-project.

is there advantage had having repo's hosted phabricator?

i guess benefit better integration phabricator. example landing github differential page, (currently) not possible. if take @ setup, can find tasks, describe it:

hosting

  • from 2011-2013, phabricator's authoritative remote public github repository. imported github diffusion. in modern phabricator, "import existing external repository" option, although option @ time.
  • in late 2013, shortly after built repository hosting, moved primary phabricator itself, , configured automatic mirror github in diffusion. made easier control access, allowed write herald rules, , let test implementation. phabricator users still use github mirror (it auto-pushes couple seconds after authoritative 1 gets updated).
  • the major advantages of hosted repositories simplified access control, access pre-commit herald rules, other pre-commit features (we'll block --force pushes default, example), , push log. using imported repository instead has no impact on of review/audit workflows.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

angularjs - ADAL JS Angular- WebAPI add a new role claim to the token -

php - CakePHP HttpSockets send array of paramms -

node.js - Using Node without global install -